posted 09-07-2009 03:51 PM
High School Students?Instructing them about the polygraph makes about as much sense as teaching them about retention and concealment when carrying a weapon.
The fact that they are kids means, by default, that they often have lots of abilities, little knowledge, and poor judgement. If this weren't the case, they'd be aforded the priveledges of young adults, not juveniles.
You could emphasize the interrogation aspects of the polygraph, and try impress all the impressionable youth with how great we are. There undoubtedly people who will be impressed and people who will not be impressed.
Or, you could teach them all about the operation of the test. And there will be some present who will be tempted or capable of misusing the information.
You could attempt to offer them a sales-job and schlep a bunch of confidence and mis-information onto them. However, anyone with half-an ounce of curiousity, which will be those who are intelligent and those who would misuse the information, will get on the internet and check for themselves. For those intelligent youth, disseminating misinformation will not help with the long-term credibility of the science and field practice of polygraph testing. For those youth who would attempt to test the polygraph or misuse the information, their eventual discovery of good information on the Internet will fuel their arrogance and recklessness, and will foster only disdain and disbelief in the credibility of the polgyraph.
I suggest you emphasize the science aspects of the polygraph. Signal detection theory, decision theory, inferential statistics, and physiololgy. Stay away from the psychology aspects of the polygraph - it's far too complex a rabit hole and our tendency to overemphasize fear as a basis of response unlikely to provide any benefit with a youthful audience. Save that schpiel for an actual polygraph test.
Some high school students will undoubtedly compare whatever you tell them to what they see online.
Juveniles will eventually grow up, and the long term credibility of our science will be improved if you provide good accurate information. The challenge is to provide information that is useful to both them and to us. That means, stick to the facts. Just like in court: credibility is not gained by denying the obvious or misstating things.
I would be more interested in the opportunity for long-term credibility improvement for the profession than the short-term wow-factor. I'm also concerned about short term disruption, when the silly kids grow up a little and may find themselves needing to take a polygraph or two.
Go for the science emphasis.
.02
r
------------------
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room."
--(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)